AQUATIC BIOGX Aquatic BioGX Initiative
JP / EN Join Initiative
Menu Carbon SequestrationWater & CircularBiodiversitySatellite MRVMembers
JP / EN Join Initiative
Axis 01 · Carbon Sequestration

Axis 01: Carbon Sequestration
Deep-sea carbon fixation via the Blue Hole mechanism

Engineered microalgal blooms (diatoms, haptophytes) tilt the Redfield ratio and trigger opal-ballasted sinking that accelerates the biological pump 5–20× relative to natural marine snow. Durable credits priced $100–300/tCO₂ are issued with satellite × AI MRV (State of CDR 2024).

TRL 4 Pilot Ready · 2026
CDR Potential 1–3Gt Nutrient fertilization · NASEM 2022
Target Cost $25–125/tCO₂ NASEM 2022 · 2035
CDR per ha 5–15tCO₂ 1 ha · yr (engineered)
Mechanism

Four components of Climate · CDR

① Anthropogenic Redfield shift

Controlling the N:P:Si nutrient ratio

Moves the community C:N from the natural 6.6:1 (Redfield 1963; Martiny 2013 reports 7.4) toward 8–14 in diatom-dominated blooms (Sambrotto et al. 1993), increasing carbon fixed per cell.

01 / 04
② Opal ballast sinking

Biogenic silica accumulates in cell walls

Biogenic opal (specific gravity ≈ 2.0–2.1) concentrates in diatom frustules. Once aggregate density exceeds seawater, the assembly transitions to fast sinking (Klaas & Archer 2002).

02 / 04
③ Fast sinking (5–20× natural)

Engineered bloom 50–200 m/day

Against marine snow medians of 10–75 m/day (Alldredge 1988), ballasted diatom aggregates are measured at 100–400 m/day (Iversen & Ploug 2010). 50–80% reach >1,000 m depending on injection site (Siegel et al. 2021).

03 / 04
④ Operational containment

Bathymetric siting × bubble curtain × satellite-guided operations

Instead of a physical sheet, containment is achieved through (i) site selection inside semi-enclosed basins with deep sills, (ii) pneumatic bubble curtains proven at Port of Rotterdam, and (iii) operation only within satellite- and hydrodynamic-model-approved windows (Port of Rotterdam 2023; Coates et al. 2016).

04 / 04
Key Metric

$3.0B /yr

Carbon Credit Market · 2040 · 30 Mt-CO₂ × $100/t — lower bound of State of CDR 2024 durable pricing

International Standards
  • London Protocol · Annex — compliant with the "bona fide scientific research" provision
  • Voluntary credit certifications — Puro.earth / Verra and additional registries
  • Puro.earth · Verra · ICVCM — Core Carbon Principles (CCP) aligned
  • Verra SD VISta · TNFD — biodiversity and nature-related disclosure
Process Schematic

Deep-sea carbon fixation via the Blue Hole

Cross-section of the four-step process: nutrient control → diatom-biased bloom → opal-ballasted sinking → >1,000 m arrival.

PROCESS SCHEMATIC · Engineered microalgal bloom Operational containment × opal ballast = fast sinking
References

Primary sources for all numerical, methodological, and regulatory claims. Forward-looking estimates are explicitly marked as 'target'. Currency conversion uses OECD 2024 annual average ≈ 150 JPY/USD.

  1. [01]
    Alldredge, A. L. & Silver, M. W. · 1988 — Characteristics, dynamics and significance of marine snow · Progress in Oceanography 20, 41–82 ↗ doi.org/10.1016/0079-6611(88)90053-5 Marine snow sinking velocities range 1–368 m/day; typical tens of m/day.
  2. [02]
    Iversen, M. H. & Ploug, H. · 2010 — Ballast minerals and the sinking carbon flux in the ocean · Biogeosciences 7, 2613–2624 ↗ doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2613-2010 Opal/CaCO₃-ballasted diatom aggregates sink at 100–400 m/day.
  3. [03]
    Armstrong, R. A. et al. · 2002 — A new, mechanistic model for organic carbon fluxes in the ocean based on the quantitative association of POC with ballast minerals · Deep-Sea Research II 49, 219–236 ↗ doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00101-1
  4. [04]
    Klaas, C. & Archer, D. E. · 2002 — Association of sinking organic matter with various types of mineral ballast in the deep sea · Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16, 1116 ↗ doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001765 Biogenic opal density ~2.0–2.1 g/cm³ used in global ballast flux model.
  5. [05]
    Martiny, A. C. et al. · 2013 — Strong latitudinal patterns in the elemental ratios of marine plankton and organic matter · Nature Geoscience 6, 279–283 ↗ doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1757 Updated global C:N:P of marine plankton (163:22:1).
  6. [06]
    Sambrotto, R. N. et al. · 1993 — Elevated consumption of carbon relative to nitrogen in the surface ocean · Nature 363, 248–250 ↗ doi.org/10.1038/363248a0 Diatom bloom C:N uptake ratios of 8–14.
  7. [07]
    Siegel, D. A. et al. · 2021 — Assessing the sequestration time scales of some ocean-based carbon dioxide reduction strategies · Environmental Research Letters 16, 104003 ↗ doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0be0 Sequestration efficiency 50–90% depends on injection latitude/depth; >1000 m gives century-scale durability.
  8. [08]
    IPCC · 2022 — AR6 Working Group III · Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change, Chapter 12 & Cross-Chapter Box on CDR ↗ www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/chapter/chapter-12/ Ocean biological pump sequestration durability decades–millennial.
  9. [09]
    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · 2022 — A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration ↗ doi.org/10.17226/26278 Ocean nutrient fertilization (phytoplankton-driven biological pump): CDR potential 1–3 Gt CO₂/yr with high uncertainty, cost $25–125/tCO₂.
  10. [10]
    Smith, S. M. et al. · 2024 — The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal — 2nd Edition ↗ www.stateofcdr.org/ Durable CDR clearing $100–300/tCO₂ in 2024; mCDR MRV uncertainty often ±20–50%.
  11. [11]
    Bach, L. T. et al. · 2023 — Identifying the most (cost-)efficient regions for CO₂ removal with iron fertilization in the Southern Ocean · Frontiers in Climate 5, 1075299 ↗ doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1075299
  12. [12]
    IMO London Protocol · 2013 — Resolution LP.4(8) — Amendment to the London Protocol regulating marine geoengineering (Annex 4) ↗ www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/London-Convention-Protocol.aspx Regulates placement of matter for ocean fertilization and other marine geoengineering.
  13. [13]
    GESAMP Working Group 41 · 2019 — High Level Review of a Wide Range of Proposed Marine Geoengineering Techniques · GESAMP Reports & Studies 98 ↗ www.gesamp.org/publications/high-level-review-of-a-wide-range-of-proposed-marine-geoengineering-techniques
  14. [14]
    Coates, J. M. et al. · 2016 — Pneumatic bubble curtains for mitigation of underwater noise from offshore pile driving · Marine Pollution Bulletin ↗ doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.017 Bubble curtains deliver 10–20 dB attenuation; mature offshore engineering deployed in Europe/Asia.
  15. [15]
    Port of Rotterdam Authority · 2023 — Pneumatic bubble screen against salt intrusion in the Nieuwe Waterweg ↗ www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/pneumatic-bubble-screen-nieuwe-waterweg Full-scale pneumatic barrier reducing salt-water intrusion; operational engineering precedent.
Other Working Groups

Linked to the other three working groups

02 Water · Resource Circulation

Water & Resource Circulation

High-efficiency N / P removal with 40–60% OPEX cut

Open → 03 Fishery · Biodiversity

Ecosystem & Biodiversity

Ocean ranching × nature credit issuance

Open → 04 Satellite MRV

Satellite Monitoring

Credit integrity via satellite × AI-fused MRV

Open →